Feed aggregator

Indian trust claims brought under the Indian Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1505;subject matter jurisdiction circumscribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1500; same-day filings;effect of time of filing during day Signed by Judge Lettow.

Entitlement, stipulation, hepatitis B, MMR, seizures. Signed by Special Master Moran.

ANTOINETTE CHIN, v. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Signed by Special Master Vowell.

Stipulation; HepB; Transverse Myelitis. Signed by Special Master Golkiewicz.

Attorneys' fees and costs; hourly rate for attorney; Rupert IV; number of hours for a paralegal; cost for an expert; reasonable basis. Signed by Special Master Moran.

Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Special Master Golkiewicz.

Interim Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Special Master Golkiewicz.

Fifth Amendment Takings Claim; RCFC 12(c); Judgment on the Pleadings; Exotic Newcastle Disease in Livestock; 7 U.S.C. § 8306 (2000); Motion to Amend; RCFC 15 Signed by Judge Sweeney.

JEFFREY G. WALLS, v. THE UNITED STATES, Signed by Judge Sweeney.

Trademark license agreement; contract interpretation; parol evidence; integration clause Signed by Judge Margolis.

Autism, statute of limitations,Markovich. Signed by Special Master Moran.

Decision on Stipulation. Signed by Special Master Abell.

BARUCH VEGA, v. THE UNITED STATES, Signed by Judge Merow.

entitlement, multiple vaccines,anaphylaxis, death, conceded case. Signed by Special Master Moran.

SARANG CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES Signed by Judge Braden.

Fifth Amendment; Takings; Police Power;Motion for Reconsideration; Innocent Owner; Evidence for Criminal Prosecution Signed by Judge Smith.

Post-Award Bid Protest; Responsiveness Depends on a Bid's Facial Compliance with Material Requirements of the Solicitation; Elements of Proof for a "Bait and Switch" Challenge; Awardee's Rejected Proposal for Post-Award Contract Signed by Judge Bush.

Contracts—Bid Protest: (i) The use of an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract to acquire construction services constitutes a permissible exercise of the procurement authority under the FAR § 1.102(d);(ii) 15 U.S.C. § § 631(j), 644; 10 U.S.C. § 2382(a)—Restrictions against bundling of contract requirements,even if applicable to general construction work, do not apply when, on the basis of comprehensive advice provided by the construction industry, the procuring agency determines bundling to be necessary and justified; (iii) 15 U.S.C. § 644 note—The procuring agency is not required to seek a waiver of statutory restrictions barring set-asides for general small business concerns when the agency's needs require participation by contractors that are able to support construction projects generally exceeding small business revenue standards; (iv) 10 U.S.C. § 2305(a)—Statutory two-phase design/build selection procedures are not restricted to acquisitions involving a single structure or group of structures at a single location, nor do they require the award of three or more contracts;(v) FAR § § 16.504(a)(3), 36.204—The procuring agency did not overstate its needs to the detriment of the ability of small businesses to participate in the solicitation when the regulations barred disclosure of the government price estimate and task orders were identified in terms of minimum and maximum dollar values Signed by Judge Wiese.

United States Postal Service; Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1)(overtime compensation); Territorial Cost of Living Adjustment(TCOLA); regular rate; RCFC 15(a)motion to amend; undue prejudice; futility; opt-in class action under RCFC 23; collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) Signed by Judge Wolski.

Jurisdiction; Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982; Notice of Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment; 26 U.S.C. § 6226(e)(1); Statutory Interpretation; 1 U.S.C. § 1; Amount of Requisite Deposit;Good Faith Effort to Comply; Timing for Correction of Shortfall in Deposit Signed by Judge Williams.