Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet Explorer (6 or higher).

Search General Jurisdiction

Case Title
Keywords
Case Number
Judge
Filed Year
Filed Month
Filed Day

Date FiledJudgeCase NameKeywords: Click here to download opinion
04/23/2013LettowSYSTEM FUELS, INC., et al. V. UNITED STATES [03-2623C]Post-trial decision in a remanded case involving the Standard Contract for pickup of spent nuclear fuel; application of the 1987 industry-wide acceptance rate; causation; costs of mitigation for partial breach; avoided costs
04/22/2013BrugginkRICHARD LEE PAIVA V. THE UNITED STATES [13-49C]ORDER
04/19/2013WheelerCMS CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ET AL. V. THE UNITED STATES [12-852C]Pre-award Bid Protests; Project-based HUD Section 8 Housing Assistance Program; Procurement Contracts Contrasted With Cooperative Agreements; 31 U.S.C. §§ 6301 - 6308; Applicability of Competition in Contracting Act and Federal Acquisition Regulation; Ana
04/19/2013BrugginkPATRICIA A. GAVIN V. THE UNITED STATES [11-528C]ORDER
04/19/2013BrugginkROBERT DAVID NEAL V. THE UNITED STATES [12-915C]ORDER
04/18/2013HornOASIS INTERNATIONAL WATERS, INC. V. UNITED STATES [10-707C]Attorney-Client Privilege; Waiver; Federal Rule of Evidence 502; Clawback Order
04/18/2013SweeneyBRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORPORATION V. THE UNITED STATES [07-725C]Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450 (“ISDEAA”); RCFC 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6); Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. § 7103; Tolling; Indirect Contract Support Costs; Res Judicata
04/17/2013FirestoneJON T. HOFFMAN V. THE UNITED STATES [11-904C]ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
04/17/2013BlockSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS ENTERPRISES PROGRAM, et. al. V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [12-459C]Pre-award bid protest; Motion to supplement administrative record; Standing; Prejudice
04/16/2013FirestoneNORSAT INTERNATIONAL [AMERICA], INC. V. THE UNITED STATES [13-41C]Bid Protest; Technical Evaluation; Deference; Agency Evaluation; Lack of Significant Prejudice