USCFC General Jurisdiction-Reported

U.S. Court of Federal Claims Opinions
Updated: 1 day 2 hours ago
General Jurisdiction (Reported)
General Jurisdiction (Unreported)
Vaccine (Reported)
Vaccine (Unreported)
Keywords:
Start date:
End date:

X

There are four categories on the left side of the search bar, each with a check box. The currently visible cateogry is highlighted yellow. To search multiple categories at once, place a check mark next to each desired category. Note if none are selected, the search will default to all categories. You must select additional search parameters (keyword, judicial officer, date range) if you specify a case category.

To search for specific words, enter one or more keywords in the search term box, then click the Search button. To search for a phrase, enclose it in quotes, "like this." Keywords and search terms are not case sensitive. You do not need to use wildcards.

To search by case number, enter the case number in xx-yyy format in the keywords box. The first two digits before the dash are the year in which the case was opened. If this year is 2000 through 2009, include the leading zero for best results.

To search by judicial officer (a particular judge or special master), click the drop-down menu "(judicial officer)" then make your selection from the list. If you decide to not search for a specific judicial officer, choose "(judicial officer)" from the list.

Dates are expected to be month/day/year format, also known as mm/dd/yyyy format. If you use a dash/hyphen as the separator, the search engine will expect the date to be in yyyy-mm-dd format (in other words, the year comes first; this is the European format).

Search results will have relevant terms highlighted so you can see why a particular item appears in the results. Note: Results are limited to 500 items; if your search returns 500 items, try adjusting it to get more specific results.

To clear your search results and view posted opinions, click on one of the category labels.

To close this help text, click on the Help! button again, or click the blue X in the upper right corner of this box.

04-987C • ANGELA AYRES d/b/a S&A DEVELOPMENT GROUP, pro se, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Civil Penalty; Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act, 42 U.S.C. § § 4821 et seq.; Motion to Reconsider, RCFC 59; Residential Lead-Based Paint Reduction Act of 1992, 42 U.S.C. § § 4851 et seq.; Tolling Statute of Limitations; Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. § § 2601 et seq.;
Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. 24 C.F.R. § § 35.92(a), 35.94; 28 C.F.R. § 14.2(a);
FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1);
RCFC 5(a), 5(e), 7 Signed by Judge Braden.

95-513C • CHARTER FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,v.THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Breach of Implied Contract;
Mutuality of Intent;
Remand; Supervisory Goodwill; Winstar-related case Signed by Judge Braden.

04-382T • NAILA M. QURESHI, v.THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Alternative Minimum [Federal Income] Tax, 26 U.S.C. § § 55-59; Jurisdiction; Pro se;
Summary Judgment, RCFC 56(c); 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a);
28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1);
28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) Signed by Judge Braden.

04-1654C • MICHAEL SINDRAM, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § § 12101 et seq.; Civil Rights, 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Claims Against District of Columbia;
Pro Se; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Transfer, 28 U.S.C. § 1631; 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) Signed by Judge Braden.

03-2489L • DIANNE J. MILLER and ROBERT N. MILLER, and LISA M. SHANIKA, For Themselves and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situat

Filed 08/31/2005

DIANNE J. MILLER and ROBERT N. MILLER, and LISA M. SHANIKA, For Themselves and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, v. THE UNITED STATES

 (03-2489L)

Inverse Condemnation; Rails to Trails Act; Fee versus easement

Signed by Judge Bruggink.

05-200C • SALMAN, ALBERT R., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Pro se; Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (2000); Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment Claim; 28 U.S.C. § § 1495, 2513 (2000) Signed by Judge Bush.

04-1687C • CALVIN HAWKINS and DONNA L. HAWKINS, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Bureau of Justice Assistance; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, RCFC 56.1;
Public Safety Officers' Benefits Act, 42 U.S.C. § § 3796, et seq.; Ripeness;
Standing; Statute of Limitations Signed by Judge Braden.

04-1455C • SHONDA SCOTT HILLENSBECK and SAMANTHA SCOTT, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Bureau of Justice Assistance; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, RCFC 56.1; "Public Safety Officer," 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(8)(A); Public Safety Officers' Benefits Act,
42 U.S.C. § § 3796, et seq.;
Standing; Statute of Limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501; "Student," 5 U.S.C. § 8101(17) Signed by Judge Braden.

05-413C • PARK TOWER MANAGEMENT, LTD., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/31/2005
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, RCFC 56.1; Post-Award Bid Protest; RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS § 205 Signed by Judge Braden.

02-223V • RYAN KELLEY, v. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Filed 08/31/2005
Vaccine Act; Non-Table Injury; Causation-in-fact; Not in Accordance with Law Signed by Judge Hewitt.

03-271C • AL GHANIM COMBINED GROUP CO. GEN. TRAD. & CONT. W.L.L., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/30/2005
Pleading and practice; Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2000);
eligibility requirements, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(B)(ii); prevailing party, 28 U.S.C. § § 2412(d)(1)(A), 2412(d)(2)(B)(ii) Signed by Judge Miller, C..

03-2164T • JADE TRADING, LLC, ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/30/2005
FED. R. EVID. 1006; Untimely Disclosure of Trial Exhibits; Untimely Identification of Documents Underlying Summary Chart; RCFC, Appendix A, ¶ 13 Signed by Judge Williams.

00-136L • LINDA VAIZBURD and ARKADY VAIZBURD, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/30/2005
Remand; Constitutional taking; Physical invasion by sand; Damages based on cost of cure Signed by Judge Bruggink.

05-585T • GEORGE C. GEORGEFF and DENISE S. GEORGEFF, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/29/2005
Tax Refund; Motion to Dismiss; 26 U.S.C. § 6511; Statute of Limitations Signed by Judge Horn.

94-1C, etc., • CIENEGA GARDENS, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/29/2005
Trial of temporary takings claims after remand; National Housing Act; Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act; Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act; Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act; ripeness; accord and satisfaction; Assignment of Claims Act; temporary taking; just compensation Signed by Judge Lettow.

93-601C • DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/26/2005
Motion for Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (2000); Money-Mandating Statute; Saint Elizabeths Hospital and District of Columbia Mental Health Services Act, 24 U.S.C. § § 225-225h (2000); Bowen v. Massachusetts, 487 U.S. 879 (1988) Signed by Judge Bush.

92-828C • HANSEN BANCORP, INC., ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/24/2005
Contracts; breach of contract; Winstar case; goodwill; amortization of covered-asset assistance; restitution; material breach of contract; judicial estoppel; SM-1 forbearance Signed by Judge Miller, C..

04-0033C • CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/24/2005
Spent nuclear fuel cases; subject matter jurisdiction; motion to dismiss; Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982;
damages for alleged partial breach of contract; Restatement (Second) Contracts § 348(2)(a); takings Signed by Judge Lettow.

98-553L • JAMES SARTORI, DAVID SARTORI, WILLOWBROOK COAL COMPANY, AND WILLOWBROOK FARMS, v. THE UNITED STATES - ERRATA -

Filed 08/22/2005
Categorical and regulatory taking; U.S. Const. amend. V; Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § § 1251, 1311, 1344, 1362 (2000); ripeness; "parcel as a whole;" temporary categorical taking; temporary regulatory taking Signed by Judge Miller, C..

94-785C • NEW VALLEY CORP., v. THE UNITED STATES

Filed 08/19/2005

Contracts: satellite launch services; anticipatory repudiation; right to damages. The rule recognizing the discharge of an obligation to pay damages for a total breach by repudiation where "it appears after the breach that there would have been a total failure by the injured party to perform his return promise" (Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 254(1)) is an application of the basic principle requiring the injured party to demonstrate that the breach caused the injury.

Damages: The excess of market price over contract price does not represent the exclusive measure of damages
suffered where the value of the breached contract can be determined by comparison of a hypothetical sale in the no-breach world with an actual replacement transaction in the real world.

Signed by Judge Wiese.

Pages