USCFC General Jurisdiction-Reported
U.S. Court of Federal Claims Opinions
Updated: 10 months 2 weeks ago
99-400C c/w 01-708C • IMPRESA CONSTRUZIONI GEOM. DOMENICO GARUFI, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Equal Access to Justice Act; 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2006); Supplementation of Application Required to Document Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses Signed by Judge Hewitt.
07-154C • NORMAN H. COHEN, Ed.D., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Summary Judgment; Copyright Registration; Conveyance of Exclusive Rights; Standing to Bring Suit for Copyright Infringement; Beneficial Ownership; Continuing Wrong Doctrine Unavailable; Tolling Provision; 28 U.S.C. § 1498(b); Continuing Presence of Infringing Materials Cached on the Internet Signed by Judge Hewitt.
01-40C • CROMAN CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Discovery; Motion to Reopen Fact Discovery Related to Potential Fraud Counterclaims; Motion Denied Signed by Judge Hewitt.
98-405C • CROMAN CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Discovery; Motion to Reopen Fact Discovery Related to Potential Fraud Counterclaims; Motion Denied Signed by Judge Hewitt.
09-747C • PENINSULA GROUP CAPITAL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES,
Breach of Contract Claim; Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); Failure to State a Claim; RCFC 12(b)(6) Signed by Judge Futey.
79-4582L into which has been consolidated No. 79-4592L • THE SHOSHONE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE WIND RIVER RESERVATION, WYOMING, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Motion to Amend Opinion and Judgment; Motion Granted Signed by Judge Hewitt.
07-589C • JEFFREY B. KING, SCOTT A. AUSTIN, KEVIN J. HARRIS, AND JOHN J. HAYS, on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Motion to Substitute Class Counsel; RCFC 23(g), 83.1(c) Signed by Judge Hewitt.
10-289C • FAS SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant and VINNELL BROWN & ROOT LLC, Intervenor-Defendant
Post-award bid protest; jurisdiction to review suspension; review of discretion under FAR 9.405(d)(3) not to reinstate offeror; Competition In Contracting Act of 1984, Pub. L. No. 98-369, § 2713, 98 Stat. 1175 (1984) Signed by Judge Merow.
09-771C • K-LAK CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Motion to Dismiss; Bid Protest Jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1); Jurisdiction Over CDA Claims, 28 USC § 1491(a)(2); Standing; Removal from Small Business Program, 8(a); GSA Schedule Signed by Judge Firestone.
03-2627C • ENTERGY NUCLEAR FITZPATRICK, LLC, ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT 3, LLC, and ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Spent Nuclear Fuel case; motion to strike affirmative defense; “unavoidable delays”; Northern States Power Co. v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy, 128 F.3d 754 (D.C. Cir. 1997); writ of mandamus; Nebraska Public Power Dist. v. United States, 590 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2010); damages v. liability; waiver; laches Signed by Judge Damich.
09-641C • GONZALEZ-MCCAULLEY INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES,
RCFC 12(b)(1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; well-pleaded complaint rule; RCFC 9(k) special pleading requirement; contract implied in fact; bid protest; Competition in Contracting Act; Contract Disputes Act; RCFC 15(a) leave to amend Signed by Judge Damich.
91-1470L • THE ESTATE OF E. WAYNE HAGE AND THE ESTATE OF JEAN N. HAGE, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Final Damages Award Plus Interest; Joint Submission of Interest Calculations Signed by Judge Smith.
03-2209C • ENGLEWOOD TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Michigan Limited Partnership, v. UNITED STATES,
Owner Claims for Breach of Housing Assistance Payment Contract Damages and Lost Equity Damages, Foreseeability, Federal Rule of Evidence 701 Signed by Judge Horn.
07-324C • TODD CONSTRUCTION, L. P., f/k/a, TODD CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Challenge to performance evaluation; jurisdiction pursuant to Contract Disputes Act; Christian doctrine; provision benefitting Government or contractor as basis for claim; Freightliner Corp. v. Caldera, 225 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2000); standing to sue for procedural violations; causal connection to injury; redressability; failure to state a claim that agency abused its discretion in rating contractor’s performance as “unsatisfactory” Signed by Judge Miller, G..
10-334C • JAMES A. WASHINGTON, v. UNITED STATES,
Request for appointment of counsel in civil action; ability of the United States Court of Federal Claims to appoint counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915; appointment of counsel only appropriate under extraordinary circumstances Signed by Judge Lettow.
09-750C • INFINITI INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,
Post-award bid protest; judgment previously entered in the form of a declaration setting aside the protested contractual award; motion by the government for relief from judgment; RCFC 60(b)(6) Signed by Judge Lettow.
09-883C • DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, and RAASS BROTHERS, INC., Intervenor
Post-award Bid Protest; Small Business HUBZone Set-aside; Discovery; Depositions;Subpoenas; Supplementation of the Administrative Record Signed by Judge Williams.
05-708C • SCOTT TIMBER, INC., v. UNITED STATES,
Testimony via videoconferencing; RCFC 43(a); appropriate safeguards Signed by Judge Lettow.
09-370 C • NATHANIEL WAYNE GAY, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Military pay case; Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction – RCFC 12(b)(1); “Wellpled” complaint – no necessity that complaint specify money-mandating statutes upon which Tucker Act jurisdiction is based; RCFC 8(a)(1) – notice pleading statute; Disability claim; 10 U.S.C. § 1201; Lack of jurisdiction over disability claim – Chambers; Disability claim dismissed,without prejudice Signed by Judge Allegra.
09-704C • DALE A. GILBRETH, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Military Pay; Disability Retirement; Board for Correction of Military Records; 28 U.S.C. § 2501; Accrual of Claim Signed by Judge Bruggink.
Pages