Keywords: re: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment; Construction Contract Dispute; Whether Default Termination is Excusable; Government Duty to Provide Reasonable Clarification Upon Request; Existence of Material Fact Issues.
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion - Bid Protest; Financial Management Software Systems and Related Services; Migration to Federal Shared Service Providers Without Competition; Competition in Contracting Act of 1984; Economy Act; Government Management Reform Act of 1994; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Ripeness; Standing; Supplementation of the Administrative Record; Amendment of Complaint
Keywords: re: Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); Unjust Conviction and Imprisonment; 28 U.S.C. § 1495; 28 U.S.C. § 2513.
Keywords: re: Administrative Record,RCFC 52.1Bid Protest;Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR),15.306 (Clarifications),15.404-1 (Unbalanced Pricing),16.201 (Firm-Fixed Contracts);52.215-1 (Instructions To Offerors)Preliminary Injunction,RCFC 65.
Keywords: re: Order on Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6), Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Reported Opinion. Claims for Breach of Employment Settlement Agreement, Discrimination, Defamation of Character, Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Retaliation; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Lack of Money-Mandating Source of Law or Settlement Provision.
Keywords: re:22 U.S.C. § 2291 et seq. (Overseas PrivateInvestment Corporation);28 U.S.C. § 1491 (Tucker Act);41 U.S.C. § 7102 (Contract Disputes Act);Jurisdiction;Motion To Dismiss,RCFC 12(b)(1) (Subject-matterjurisdiction),RCFC 12(b)(6) (Failure to state a claim).
Keywords: re: Rails-to-Trails; Fifth Amendment Takings; National Trails System Act; Illinois Law; Fee Simple; Easement; Notice of Interim Trail Use (NITU).
Keywords: re: Pro Se Plaintiff; 28 U.S.C. § 1500; Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion---Lump-Sum Payment for Annual Leave; 5 U.S.C. § 5551 et seq.; 5 C.F.R. § 550.1202; Back Pay Act; Interest; 5 U.S.C. § 5596; 5 C.F.R. § 550.803.
Keywords: re: Ability-One Program,41 C.F.R § 51-1.1(a);Bid Protest,28 U.S.C. §1491;Competition In Contracting Act Of 1984,31 U.S.C §§ 35513556;Judgment On The Administrative Record,RCFC 52.1;Small Business Concerns,38 U.S.C.§ 8127;Standing.
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion: Winstar, Tax Gross Up
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion and Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Privity of Contract; Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA); Subcontractor Claims; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Partial Summary Judgment.
Keywords: re: Jurisdiction;Motion To Dismiss,RCFC 12(b)(1);Tucker Act,28 U.S.C. § 1491.
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion; Patent case; defendants' motion for summary judgment on grounds of non-infringement.
Keywords: re: Post-Award Bid Protest; Small Business Administration; Joint Venture Agreement; 13 C.F.R. § 124.513; 13 C.F.R. § 121.103(h)(3); Mentor/Protg; Affiliation.
Keywords: re: Order on Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6), Reported Opinio: Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); Failure to State a Claim; RCFC 12(b)(6); Pleading Contractual Provisions; RCFC 9(k); Contract Disputes Act; Notice to Interested Parties; RCFC 14(b)(3); RCFC 12(b)(7)
Keywords: re: Order on Motion to Compel, Reported Opinion: Motion to compel; RCFC 37; Conferring in good faith; Discovery; Search protocol; E-discovery; Relevance of discovery, Retaking depositions; Attorneys fees pursuant to RCFC 37(a)(5)(C).
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion Bid Protest; Two-Phase Procurement; Unstated Evaluation Criteria; 10 U.S.C. §§ 2305, 2305a; FAR 15.305; Lack of Prejudice.
Keywords: re: Reported Opinion: Post-Award Bid Protest; Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; Standing; Cross-Motions for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Technical Evaluations
Keywords: re: Second litigation over a contractor's compliance with Cost Accounting Standards pertinent to indirect materiel overhead costs; government's"alternative" claim to that litigated to final judgment in the prior action; applicability of the doctrine of claim preclusion.