USCFC General Jurisdiction-Unreported

Subscribe to USCFC General Jurisdiction-Unreported feed
U.S. Court of Federal Claims Opinions
Updated: 10 months 1 week ago

20-1498 • SCHAEFFER v. USA

Filed 08/17/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION: The Court dismisses plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Ryan T. Holte. (scf) Service on parties made.

20-1462 • WOODS v. USA

Filed 08/16/2021
UNREPORTED AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER amending Unreported Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (cmc) Service on parties made.

17-825 • SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. USA

Filed 08/11/2021
REPORTED ORDER (re-issuance for publication of ORDER re 172 Reported Opinion and 176 Plaintiff's Accounting of Reasonable Costs and Expenses.). Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (srb) Service on parties made.

20-175 • SLOAN v. USA

Filed 08/10/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION denying Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (tjd) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

21-1609 • DE LA O v. USA

Filed 08/09/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for the limited purpose of determining jurisdiction. The clerk's office is directed to ENTER final judgment DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, without prejudice, pursuant to RCFC 12(h)(3). The clerk's office is further directed to RETURN any future filings not in compliance with this court's rules to plaintiff, UNFILED, without further order of the court. The court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith because, as alleged, plaintiff's claims are clearly beyond the subject matter of this court. Because plaintiff has repeatedly filed complaints which needlessly consume the resources of the court, the court hereby ENTERS the following anti-filing injunction: Paul Mark De La O, Jr. is immediately ENJOINED from filing any new complaints with this Court without first obtaining leave from the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims to do so. Any motion for leave to file must include as an attachment a full complaint that meets all of the requirements of RCFC 8; in particular the complaint must identify the source of law supporting this court's jurisdiction over the claims asserted. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Order of Dismissal; Pro Se Complaint; Sua Sponte Dismissal for Want of Jurisdiction, RCFC 12(h)(3); Transfer Not Warranted; Anti-Filing Injunction. (TQ)

20-1446 • MANNING v. USA

Filed 08/06/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION denying Motion for Summary Judgment; granting [16] Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Kathryn C. Davis. (amc) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

21-1347 • ROSS v. USA

Filed 07/30/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION on MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) filed by USA. granting [10] Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Zachary N. Somers. (ab) Service on parties made. Modified on 7/30/2021 Plaintiff served by U.S. mail. (hw1).

21-1548 • WILEY v. USA

Filed 07/30/2021
UNREPORTED Order DISMISSING CASE and granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Edward H. Meyers. (meh) Service on parties made. Modified on 7/30/2021 - Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1).

20-1012 • AMIR v. USA

Filed 07/29/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION denying MOTION for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Unreported Opinion; Motion for Reconsideration; RCFC 59(a). (TQ)

13-307 • GOLDEN v. USA

Filed 07/29/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION granting Motion to Strike; denying [231] Cross Motion; denying [234] Motion to Strike; denying [236] Cross Motion. Plaintiff's corrected infringement contentions are due on or before 8/27/2021; Defendant's response to plaintiff's corrected infringement contentions are due within two weeks of the filing of plaintiff's corrected infringement contentions.Signed by Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. (pdr) Service on parties made. Modified on 8/13/2021 - Plaintiff served by U.S. mail. (hw1).

Keywords: re: Order on Motion to Strike, Unreported Opinion, 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) (Jurisdiction Over Patent Claims, Pro Se, Motion to Strike, Patent infringement contentions.

21-990 • NACSA v. USA

Filed 07/28/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION AND ORDER granting MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) filed by USA. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. (cmc) Service on parties made.

21-1076 • D'AVILLE v. USA

Filed 07/28/2021
**RE-DOCKETED FOR POSTING TO THE COURTS WEBSITE** UNREPORTED OPINION granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (rt16) Service on parties made. (Entered: 07/28/2021)

21-1329 • DE LA O, JR. v. USA

Filed 07/27/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION AND ORDER. Because no possible construction of the plaintiff's complaint permits the Court to exercise jurisdiction over the claims raised by the plaintiff, that complaint must be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1) and RCFC 12(h)(3). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. No costs are awarded. Signed by Judge Richard A. Hertling. (dhf) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

15-1189 • MARINE INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. USA

Filed 07/23/2021
**RE-DOCKETED FOR POSTING TO THE COURT'S WEBSITE.** UNREPORTED ORDER granting [110] plaintiff's motion for site visit. JSR on in-person oral argument and proposed details for site visit due 7/30/21 at 3:00 p.m. EDT. Signed by Judge Ryan T. Holte. (tb) Service on parties made. Modified on 8/16/2021 to correct date

21-1555 • ROSS v. USA

Filed 07/23/2021
UNREPORTED ORDER directing the clerk's office to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; directing the clerk's office to RETURN any future filings not in compliance with this court's rules to plaintiff, UNFILED, without further order of the court; and because plaintiff has repetitively filed complaints which needlessly consume the resources of the court, the court hereby ENTERS the following anti-filing injunction: Ira Jerome Ross is immediately ENJOINED from filing any new complaints with this Court without first obtaining leave from the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims to do so. Any motion for leave to file must include as an attachment a full complaint that meets all of the requirements of RCFC 8; in particular the complaint must identify the source of law supporting this courts jurisdiction over the claims asserted. Thus, the clerks office is directed to REJECT all future complaints from Ira Jerome Ross unless filed by leave of the Chief Judge. Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Unreported Order; Pro Se Complaint; Lack of Jurisdiction; Transfer; Anti-Filing Injunction. (TQ)

21-1377 • PODLUCKY v. USA

Filed 07/23/2021
UNREPORTED ORDER denying Motion for Reconsideration - Rule 59(a). Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made; plaintiff served via U.S. mail.

Keywords: re: Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Unreported Order; Motion for Reconsideration; RCFC 59(a). (TQ)

19-1752 • THE CENTECH GROUP, INC. v. USA

Filed 07/16/2021
UNREPORTED ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion to Compel; on [32] First MOTION to Compel filed by THE CENTECH GROUP, INC. Signed by Judge Thompson M. Dietz. (adb) Service on parties made.

Keywords: re: Motion to Compel; Reasonable Expenses; RCFC 37.

21-1220 • PLAINTIFF NO. 1, ET AL. v. USA

Filed 07/14/2021
UNREPORTED OPINION AND ORDER denying government's Motion to Dismiss per Rule 12(b)(1) and Vacate the Court's Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (tjd) Service on parties made.

20-75 • NEVILLE v. USA

Filed 07/13/2021
UNREPORTED ORDER denying Motion to Reopen Case; on [9] MOTION to Reopen Case filed by ROBERT NEVILLE, MD. Signed by Senior Judge Victor J. Wolski. (jak) Service on parties made.

21-1555 • ROSS v. USA

Filed 07/09/2021
UNREPORTED ORDER denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. On or before 7/30/3021, plaintiff is directed to PAY the court's required $402.00 filing fee. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. See RCFC 41(b). Signed by Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (TQ) Service on parties made. Modified on 7/9/2021 - Plaintiff served via U.S. mail. (hw1).

Keywords: re: Unreported Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Pro Se; Prison Litigation Reform Act; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Three-Strikes Bar.(TQ)

Pages